Just
getting to interview with our three subjects—Ron Barsano, Rod Goebel, and Rulon
Hacking—was difficult. The arrangements
were made: 7 p.m. at Rod Goebel’s house
just west of Arroyo Seco; Rulon would pick me up around 6:30, and Ron would
meet all of us at Rod’s. I picked up a
six pack to facilitate the discussion, ease the tensions and inhibitions
inherent in the perverse process of the interview situation. 6:30 came and went with no sign of
Rulon. At ten to seven I popped open a
beer, lit a cigarette, and got on the phone—no Rulon. 7:10 and I’m sure he’s forgotten the whole
thing. I’m calling his home every 30
seconds or so and pacing. In desperation
I call a good friend of his. The person
on the other end speaks soothingly.
“He’s often late you know. This
is nothing. He’ll be there. Just relax.”
Ten minutes later, Rulon arrives.
I hop in the car and we head out of town. “This damn car has been . . .” and before he
can finish his sentence the car gives an insinuating cough and the engine
dies. “See?” he says as we coast off the
road onto the shoulder. “Vapor-lock.
Gotta let it cool off for a few minutes.
Might as well have one of those beers there.” We sit and drink. I glance at Rulon who’s staring rapturously
at the mountain bathed in the crimson gold of the sunset. “God, look at that will you?” I look.
That’s it! That’s what these guys
are doing, it occurs to me, trying to capture that in paint. In a few minutes we are once again on our
way, stop for more beer, and two miles down the road the engine is repeated. It happens three more times, in fact, but
we’re drinking and laughing and hardly care if we make it or not.
We
do. Rod Goebel’s house is tasteful,
elegant, almost opulent by Taos standards.
“Let me give you the tour so we can get that out of the way,” he says. It’s a solar house made of beer cans covered
with adobe plaster, beautiful gardens in the back and surrounding the
house. His studio, separate from the
living quarters, has a stirring view of the mountains. There’s a large painting in progress on the
easel (Summer Clouds over Pojoaque,
subsequently finished and pictured here.)
We go back into the living room and the tape is rolling.
Ron Barsano, Fiesta, Taos Plaza, oil on canvas, 20x30 inches |
Rulon Hacking: Yeah, I’m heading to Phoenix tomorrow
morning. My sister had a baby boy and my
parents will be there and I haven’t seen them for a while.
Rod Goebel: Well, this is a good time of year to go.
RH: (Laughter) Yeah, perfect.
RG: 119 degrees.
(Laughter) And you’re getting
vapor-lock at 85 degrees? Great!
RH: I’m going to borrow a car—a little more
reliable. I’m going to do some painting
along the trailside down there.
RG: Cactus.
Cactus is big . . . Cactus, yuccas.
RH: I tried to paint one last year. Well, several, but God, the bugs would drive
me crazy. Thorns everywhere.
RG: They know how to protect themselves.
AL:
Rod and Ron, you were both members of the Taos Six [other
members were Robert Daughters, Walt Gonske, Julian Robles, and Ray Vinella] which formed in the mid-‘70s. Would you tell us about that group?
RG: It was just a group of artists who were all
painting and doing good work and had the potential to be one of the big groups
in the country—in the West, certainly.
It was gangbusters, really. Had
it stayed together, we’d be having shows today that would . . .
Ron
Barsano: With relatively no publicity we
were involved in shows in the Philbrook Museum in Texas, the Maxwell Gallery in
San Francisco. The name caught on
unbelievably.
AL:
Why did it break up? Painterly
disputes?
RG: It’s very complicated. It was nothing among the artists. It was a matter of artists versus
galleries. The usual problem.
RB: In any group there’s going to be
problems. We all knew that so we drew up
by-laws. One of them stated that any
artist could show in any gallery he wanted to.
The only real commitment was we’d have two shows a year as a group.
(Telephone
rings. RG answers it.)
RG: Hello. (Pause) Yes. (Pause. Laughs.
To group at large) Wait. Wait a
minute. This is a woman who’s writing a
book called Who’s Who in New Mexico Bachelors.
(Much laughter from all. RG into
phone) There’s a bunch of us here, all artists, what would you like to
know? (Pause) Forty-five minute
interview? (Pause) Who’s gonna buy a book on Who’s Who in . . .
Well, what if I don’t like women?
(Laughter) So what do you
want? Um. Sure . . . (Continues talking into phone.)
RB: (Continuing) So to get back to this. Rod was dissatisfied with the gallery where
we’d all been showing. He wanted to pull
out and we talked him out of it. He
decided a second time—I gotta pull out and I don’t want to talk to the guys
because they’re going to talk me out of it again and I gotta get out of here –
which I don’t blame him. So he pulled
out without saying anything, which really upset two of the members of the Taos
Six. They thought the gallery was doing
a hell of a job for us. Anyway, the
whole thing blew up. We tried to get
back together, but it just never worked out.
The only bad thing about a group that’s promoted as the Taos Six is that
everybody knows about the Taos Six, but they don’t know Barsano. So I realized . . . I was kind of glad it
broke up.
AL:
It allowed you to establish your own identity.
RB: Right.
My own identity was more important to me than the Taos Six. I wanted people to say, “Oh you’re Barsano.”
RG: (Waving phone) Here you are, you’re next on
the list. (RG gives phone to RB,
accompanied by much laughter.)
RB: (Into phone) This is Ron Barsano, bachelor,
what can I help you with?
RG: She said someone else did a book like this in
Texas, and it was a best seller. They
had a lot of pictures . . .
AL:
They’ll probably want a lot of pictures of your place.
RG: I’m not sure I want this at all.
AL:
Let me change the direction a little bit. Do you object to being called
impressionists?
Rulon Hacking, Winter Brook, oil on canvas, 40x30 inches |
RH: It’s the best term that I can think of to
cover that manner of painting, but there’s a kind of stigma attached to a
school of painting that’s a century old.
When you say impressionist,
people automatically think of Monet or whoever, rather than think of what
impressionism is—the projecting of an impression of a scene, or a feeling,
without having to do the whole . . .
RG: The fact of the matter is that the
impressionists were painting what was really
going on out there in the real world,
and they were the first ones to do this.
The public tends to think that impressionism is an artificial style or
technique, whereas it’s really the most accurate means of representing the
truth—the truth of light and form as it exists outside. Monet was out there! And so impressionism is far more realistic
than what people think of as realism. It is more
realistic.
(RB
interrupts, handing RH, bachelor number three, the phone.)
RH: Hello.
Yes.
RG: (To all)
Let’s wait until this is over.
RH: (Into phone) Pardon? R-U-L-O-N H-A-C-K-I-N-G . . . five foot ten .
. . (much laughter) … Do I have to remain single for a whole year? Well, I’m dating a lady but I don’t want to
get married. She wants to get
married. What? All kinds of ladies . . . hmmm . . . Well it
sounds really fun. Kind of kinky though
. . . Well, okay. You know, I’m probably
the wrong guy . . . Tomorrow?! I’ll be
in Arizona . . . I’ll let you know.
Cecile Spall? . . . 471-6748 . . .in Santa Fe . . .Right. Bye. (Hangs up phone).
AL:
Is she herself single?
RH: I don’t know.
She’s a graduate student in something.
They’re going to have this big party when the thing gets published and
invite all these ladies and there’s going to be all the guys to autograph it.
RG: That would be fun!
AL:
Sounds like the all day duck races in Deming. (Laughter)
RH: What were we talking about? Impressionism, wasn’t it? (Laughter)
AL: I was saying that you all are working in a
traditional style or manner . . .
RH: It’s about the only thing left that can’t be
called contemporary. Super-realism is now called contemporary, but
it’s not new.
AL:
How did you happen to choose, individually, this style of painting?
RG: One doesn’t necessarily choose a style of painting.
Some do, and those are the people who tend to be bad artists because
they’re not . . . it’s not coming from within themselves. But a realistic vein or mode has always been
the thing that interested me. It was
natural to me. Taos was the natural
place to come because I grew up in Albuquerque.
The early Taos school was still here, the landscape is extraordinary,
the mountains are totally unique. Taos
also has a far greater variety of things to paint than any other place I’ve
seen. In Santa Fe the landscape tends to
be the same everywhere you are. The
magic is what attracted those earlier artists.
Interestingly enough, all the members of the Taos Six came out here
about the same time—about ten years ago.
And since that time, other than yourself, Rulon, there have been very,
very few other artists working in a realistic vein that have come here.
RH: I can’t think of anybody . . . What’s his
name? He does really tight
super-realism?
RG: Bill Acheff.
But, of course, Bill is not painting the area. That’s not the area—still lifes. You could do a still life in San
Bernardino. Some other young artists
have come since, but they haven’t stayed here for the most part.
AL:
Any good ones?
RG:
(Silence)
AL:
Well, why did you choose this style, Ron?
RG: When I was growing up in Chicago there was an
illustrator who lived next door and I was friends with his son. He always said that when we were old enough,
we could go to the American Academy of Art and study under William Mosby. I graduated from high school, my friend
decided he wanted to be an actor, and I went to the American Academy and
studied under William Mosby. I was very
naïve about fine art. But immediately I
knew that was what I was going to do.
RG: Why was it, Ron, that you came to Taos?
RB: I saw what happened to other artists who left
school, started painting, and thought they were better than anyone else, and I
saw how their quality and their success dropped to the point where if they
worked in the arts at all, it was with some commercial studio. I realized that you have to be open to new
things, and to criticism from other artists.
I had heard about Taos, about Fechin, some of the American Academy
students were out here, so I decided, I’m moving to Taos. I didn’t like it, but decided to stay for a
year. Then I fell completely in love
with the place for exactly the same reasons Rod gave.
RG: Plus, don’t forget, there are also so many
wonderful bachelors here. (Laughter)
AL:
Rulon, do you infuse feeling, emotion into a scene, or is it a
particular feeling that the scene conveys to you . . .
RG: (Interrupting) If you don’t put that in
there, it’s not art. Reproducing a
landscape does not make art. Only when
you put your own spirit . . . It’s much more difficult to do something that’s
realistic and at the same time show your emotional response to it, than it is
to do an abstract sort of thing, which is all emotional response. The viewer gets some emotional response from
an abstract painting, if it’s successful, but if you’re doing a realistic
painting, if that painting is good you also get the same emotional response
from that work. You’re painting not only
what is there, but you’re painting what was in you.
RH: The main component in any work is the idea,
the underlying emotion that you try to project whether it’s from arbitrary
symbols or known symbols, which is realism.
AL:
Is that a feeling you have to wait for, or are you able to conjure it?
RB: You can’t conjure up the emotion, and you
can’t wait for it or you’ll paint one or two paintings a year. And I paint ten paintings a year so I’m close
to that but not quite there. (Laughter) Your real goal is for someone to come
up to a painting and say, “I’ve been there,” to get some kind of physical
response, and not to have them say, “Well, this color will match my furniture.”
Rod Goebel, Clouds over Pojoaque, oil on canvas, 42x50 inches |
RG: You want some universal feeling to come
through. I think basically the reason
why I work in realism is that it’s universally understood.
AL:
Do you find it difficult working against almost a cliché, in the sense
that a hundred people have painted it already.
RG: It used to be that aspens were painted a
lot. Now try to find an aspen
painting. You can’t. Certain subjects, because of their inherent
beauty, are overdone, done by too many bad artists. And that is unfortunate because there is
nothing more glamorous to me than an aspen forest. It’s unfortunate that that happens because
everything is the subject of art and it can never be diminished no matter how
many times it’s used, no matter what the trends are as to what people buy. All that’s important is whether it’s a good
painting. What’s being painted isn’t all
that important to the buying public.
AL:
Apropos of that, I was in the Variant Gallery recently looking at slides
of your work, Rulon, and I came to one with an Indian figure and I remarked on
it, and the gallery director said, “I wish he’d paint more of those. If he did I’d sell them like crazy. Fifty people wanted that painting.” Does that put certain pressures on you?
RH: I think we all feel that way don’t we?
RG: There’s always a danger for any artist to
become locked into any one subject because it limits his freedom and the true
artist should have as much freedom as possible.
That should be the first and foremost thing. Certainly an artist has to live, so you are
aware of those considerations. But I’ve
always found, and I’m sure that Rulon and Ron would agree, that whenever you’re
painting something that you are really most interested in, that’s the painting
that sells. Always.
RB: I don’t know.
When I moved here aspen paintings were the hot thing to do. I never did one until last year when I was up
in Garcia Park and I saw this beautiful setting. I painted it and it never sold. (Laughter)
AL:
Somebody I knew once said that if they were going to do landscape
paintings here they’d set their easel up in the junkyard.
RG: That’s the easy way out. That’s what you find in art schools, that
sort of philosophy. Even though you’re
surrounded by beauty and inspiration, you’re not really an artist unless you do
something totally different. To search
for something outside of yourself is to ignore the basic element of art, and
that is your own humanity. And to go to
something else is false. Whether it’s
Picasso or Rembrandt, their humanity comes through their art.
AL:
Do you work more in the studio or in the field?
RH: I used to work mostly outdoors, but in the
last couple of years I’ve tried to work more from my imagination. Occasionally I do a color or pencil sketch on
the spot, but a lot of times I’ll just start from scratch, from an abstract
form—make a few brush strokes and sit there and stare at it until I think about
a scene that I remember and then try to recapture the whole thing.
RB: I don’t do any work that way. The subject matter is in front of me, but the
painting, I’m happy to say, is usually nothing like the subject that’s in front
of me. Colors are different, values are
different.
RG: The problem with working realistically is
that you still have to follow certain physical laws of nature. The tendency, I know my tendency is to ignore
that, to get lost in the excitement of the color and the paint and so on. But there are certain confines you must work
within. Now painting a landscape is, in
a way, much easier than painting a figure, because you can change the shape of
a tree very easily. You cannot change
the shape of an arm.
RH: All these things have to become second
nature. You can’t paint a masterpiece of
realism or anything and be laboring over how the finger goes. The eye can’t stop at a toe and be wondering
if that’s right. You have to feel it.
AL:
How long was it before you had that feeling?
RG: Many years.
Because the best is based on exactly that – feeling. And more often you sense or feel not when
something is right, but when it’s wrong.
And the skill comes in saying, “Why is it wrong? What will it take to make it right?” And that feeling only comes from many, many
years of doing it.
AL:
Do you enjoy talking to other artists?
RG: No.
RH: It’s hard.
RG: Part of the reason I don’t is that whenever I
have it’s always gone bad
RB: The reason is that in Taos the realistic
artists have their group of friends . . .
RG: Well Taos is just like everywhere else.
RB: No, no, I disagree. If you lived in a place like New York City,
in a building that housed every type of artist, you would get together with
that group and it would be really stimulating.
AL:
Was the Taos Six like that?
RG: No. It can be a very bad thing because when
you get a close group of artists like that they tend to paint for their
peers. And they tend to want approval,
especially when you’re working in an area that is so nebulous, where you don’t
know what you’re doing, whether it’s good or bad. So you want some kind of reinforcement and
the danger is that you tend to paint to please them. Any time you have an artist’s colony this
happens.
--Thom
Collins, September, 1981
(Rod
Goebel exhibits at the Total Arts Gallery, Taos, the Peters Corporation, Santa
Fe, and Trailside Galleries, Scottsdale.
Rulon Hacking is represented by the Variant Gallery, Taos, Pelham
Gallery, Santa Fe, Carlson Gallery, Denver, and Trailside Galleries,
Scottsdale. Ron Barsano’s agent is Linda
Hill, Box 2860, Taos. He exhibits at his
studio, and at the Wichita Gallery of Fine Art, Wichita, Kansas. Paintings by both Barsano and Goebel have
been selected for the Beijing Exhibit of
American Western Art which travels to China in November.)
I was ( on a rainy afternoon) entertained by this ancient interview. tnks
ReplyDeleteMy father knew Rod Goebel, and he actually linked me to this article. Ever since I was young, we've had two separate portraits of my dad (painted by Rod) hanging in our home. I spent about a year of my childhood in Taos when my dad and mom had decided to move there-- and ever since we left I've been trying to get back. Taos is a beautiful place.
ReplyDeleteI loved this article.
Hope you make it back
Delete